Divestment vs Non-divestment in Weapons Detection

The concept of operations (CONOPS) for using a weapons detection system can be divided into two categories: divestment and non-divestment. Divestment refers to the process of removing all items from one's person or bags before passing through the system, whereas non-divestment refers to passing through the system with all items still on one's person or bags. Both concepts have their benefits and drawbacks, and the choice between them depends on various factors such as the level of security required, the environment in which the system is used, and the type of objects that are allowed.

Divestment-based operations are commonly used in high-security environments such as prisons, courthouses, and airports. Divestment is most simply, the “empty pockets” approach. The divestment process ensures that individuals are not carrying any prohibited items on their person or in their bags, leading to a high level of security. However, divestment operations can be time-consuming and inconvenient, especially for large crowds or individuals with mobility issues. In addition, there is a risk of losing or damaging personal items during the divestment process, which can lead to frustration and complaints from individuals.

Non-divestment-based operations are best in low-security environments such as public buildings, schools, bus terminals, etc. The non-divestment process is less intrusive and more convenient for individuals, leading to a smoother and faster screening process. However, the non-divestment process may not provide the same level of security as divestment-based operations, as individuals may still carry prohibited items on their person or in their bags. In addition, the sensitivity of the weapons detection system may need to be adjusted to account for the presence of personal items such as laptops, phones, and keys, which may trigger false or nuisance alarms.

The choice between divestment and non-divestment-based operations when using a weapons detection system depends on numerous factors such as the level of security required, the environment in which the system is used, and the type of objects that are allowed. While divestment-based operations provide a higher level of security, they can be time-consuming and inconvenient for individuals. Non-divestment-based operations are less intrusive and more convenient, but may not provide the same level of security and may require adjustments to the sensitivity of the system. Ultimately, it is important to strike a balance between security and convenience when designing the concept of operations for a weapons detection system.

MIS Security LLC is a technology solutions provider, not a physical security consultant. The content of the website and MIS Security Insights blog should not be taken as professional security advice, and are subject to the Terms of Use found at https://www.missecurity.com/s/MIS-Security-Website-Terms-of-Use.pdf . MIS Security®, RONIN® and the respective logos are trademark property of MIS Security, LLC Tallahassee FL. Copyright © MIS Security 2023, all rights reserved.